knittedlampshade:

thinking about shitty awful bigoted things you said in the past

image

(via bastardlybrendan)

social-darwin-awards:

politicsandhandgrenades:

thinksquad:

Two sides of the same shit sandwich.
Libertymaniacs.com

okay come on now what does this even mean

It means “I’m totally special and different, my political opinion is pure and true and freedom and untainted by money”

It is also basically true.

blonde-swanson:

friendlycloud:

dem-queer-animals:

awesome-everyday:

shorterexcerpts:

thecallus:

theatlantic:

The Cheapest Generation: Why Aren’t Millennials Buying Cars or Houses?

What if Millennials’ aversion to car-buying isn’t a temporary side effect of the recession, but part of a permanent generational shift in tastes and spending habits? It’s a question that applies not only to cars, but to several other traditional categories of big spending—most notably, housing. And its answer has large implications for the future shape of the economy—and for the speed of recovery.

Read more. [Image: Kagan McLeod]

It’s safe to say that a decent number of Tumblr users are a part of the Millennial generation. So, tell us: Do you own a car or house? If not, why?

IT’S BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO DISPOSABLE INCOME YOU THUNDERING IDIOTS. Fucking preference has nothing to do with it. 50% of college graduates have no job! They all have the most student loan debt ever! What are you asking this question for?!

Also: housing is a good bit more expensive now.

My parents got a 15-year mortgage on a new house in the mid-70s. The house was $32,000. Average home price in that area now? $190,000.

So, home prices went up. Food prices went up. Health care prices went WAY UP. Rent prices went up. Higher education went up so damn high that some of us forgo that all together. Energy prices went up. Car prices went up.

Prices of prices went up.

We also pay cell phone bills, internet bills, data plans, text plans, online subscriptions, cable/satellite tv, netflix, DVR subscriptions — bills that didn’t even exist 30-40 years ago. We also use computers and smartphones and microwaves and other consumer electronics that didn’t exist 20-50 years ago.

We need medications and doctors and contact lenses and tampons and maxi pads and other things that cost money just to be alive and keep us healthy.

Most of us can’t afford to:

  1. Get married and have a “Traditional” big wedding
  2. Buy a house
  3. Buy a new car
  4. PLAN to have children
  5. Take two, consecutive weeks of vacation.

Jobs that paid 50k in the late 1990s now pay between 30-35. Interest rates that favor consumers have gone down.

So I say, no. We are not choosing not to buy homes. We’re not choosing to take the bus in cities where there’s no good public transit. WE ARE NOT CHOOSING TO LIVE WHAT SOCIETY DEEMS AS AN UNDESIRABLE LIFESTYLE.

Don’t even get me started on the fact that these two people in the picture are young white hipsters. Young black and brown folks have been forgoing homeownership and buying new cars for decades, this shit isn’t new, pal. You’re just acting like this shit is new because it’s hitting white folks.

anyway, my point is: We are fucking broke.

read the commentary above ^^

http://24.media.tumblr.com/a992c383a946c852a20ae7472c749a8c/tumblr_mj60ddKeXv1s7z9oto3_500.jpg

The original post is just so out of touch that it hurts

(via social-darwin-awards)

princessfuckingprivilege:

whoneedsfeminism:

“Gairls are nto complicated. Seriously. How hard is it to say ‘you’re pretty’ and give us chocolate?”
I need feminism because this is an “acceptable” portrayal of women. 

I’d be happy forever if someone just kept telling me I’m pretty and giving me chocolate. CLEARLY I AM A TOOL OF THE PATRIARCHY. 

Is this not accurate for the human race? I’m a man and I would be super fucking pleased for this to be my life.

princessfuckingprivilege:

whoneedsfeminism:

“Gairls are nto complicated. Seriously. How hard is it to say ‘you’re pretty’ and give us chocolate?”

I need feminism because this is an “acceptable” portrayal of women. 

I’d be happy forever if someone just kept telling me I’m pretty and giving me chocolate. CLEARLY I AM A TOOL OF THE PATRIARCHY. 

Is this not accurate for the human race? I’m a man and I would be super fucking pleased for this to be my life.

arguspanoptikos:

factualwiley:

Quite a few searches end up with something similar.

I put in “guns” for the hell of it and got back: Experiment: There may be confidential content in your search results. Please do not share outside Google.

Is this Google fighting CISPA?

theycallme-changeling:

littleredridingkyle:

notawittyurl:

In europe you don’t say ‘i love you’ you just vote for your neighbouring countries in Eurovision I think that’s hauntingly beautiful

UK gives Ireland 12 points, Ireland gives UK at least 6 points. The ultimate story of unrequited love.

The UK get their missing 6 point when we get our missing 6 counties.

image

(via bastardlybrendan)

adriofthedead:

snoozlebee:

allisonkilkenny:

Chris Person fixed TIME’s new magazine cover. Now it’s accurate. (TIME version #1, Person edit #2)
Update: And here’s another stellar contribution from @direlog

EXCELLENT


From @EARNEST_CYBORG9

A good TED Talk on why Gen X (to which the author of this article belongs) hates Millennials. adriofthedead:

snoozlebee:

allisonkilkenny:

Chris Person fixed TIME’s new magazine cover. Now it’s accurate. (TIME version #1, Person edit #2)
Update: And here’s another stellar contribution from @direlog

EXCELLENT


From @EARNEST_CYBORG9

A good TED Talk on why Gen X (to which the author of this article belongs) hates Millennials. adriofthedead:

snoozlebee:

allisonkilkenny:

Chris Person fixed TIME’s new magazine cover. Now it’s accurate. (TIME version #1, Person edit #2)
Update: And here’s another stellar contribution from @direlog

EXCELLENT


From @EARNEST_CYBORG9

A good TED Talk on why Gen X (to which the author of this article belongs) hates Millennials.

adriofthedead:

snoozlebee:

allisonkilkenny:

Chris Person fixed TIME’s new magazine cover. Now it’s accurate. (TIME version #1, Person edit #2)

Update: And here’s another stellar contribution from @direlog

EXCELLENT

image

From @EARNEST_CYBORG9

A good TED Talk on why Gen X (to which the author of this article belongs) hates Millennials.

(via bastardlybrendan)

bastardlybrendan:

oyrishcreme:

sonicdoctors:

dead-end-generation:

So I got sent to the dean today for wearing this top. My study tech teacher said that I was “exploiting” myself and that it could be a distraction to the other students. I got up out of my seat and told her that I wasn’t going to listen to her dress codes. In a way, she was being misogynist and slut shaming and I think that’s wrong. I will continue to wear what I want and nobody can tell me not to. The fact that womens bodies are sexualized and objectified so much angers me and that’s the reason why this happened. I’m going to wear what I want, how I want, when I want and that’s it.

I was there, reblog the shit out of this guys

I’m a guy. I can’t wear a shirt like this either, even though I’m not going to be wearing a bra. it’s dress code. It’s not slut shaming. You can’t show your bra like that at most jobs. why should you at school? Yes sexism is wrong and all that, but you can’t get ‘angry at the patriarchy” because you can’t show your undergarments in public. I’m not going to wear jeans with a rip in the side  or the front that show off my flowery boxers, because that’s just not appropriate for school. Have some professionalism. You can wear whatever you like at home or with your friends or whatever, yes, but school prepares you for real life.
 At work you can’t have this attitude of “I wear the fuck ever I want.” and expect to keep your job. School is the same way because it’s trying to teach you that lesson. That’s unrealistic; almost any job you get is going to have someone tell you what to wear or what to do because you work for them and you represent their company. If you don’t look the way they need you to look, that makes them look bad. A tattoo parlor probably isn’t going to hire someone who dresses like a nun and a top company isn’t going to hire someone who comes to work in a tank top that shows off her bra or a guy that shows off his ballsack. 
You can’t blame patriarchy for this, I’m sorry. You can’t blame sexism for this. If I wore booty shorts and you could almost see my balls through my semi transparent flowery goddamn boxers, I would get in the same amount of trouble as you, and it’s within good reason.

OP really was just trying far too hard.
Feel lucky you get to wear your normal clothes instead of a school uniform. 

Schools probably should have uniforms because of things like this, even though I fucking hated mine. If it is true (and it might well be) that the teacher said she was exploiting herself that is bullshit. bastardlybrendan:

oyrishcreme:

sonicdoctors:

dead-end-generation:

So I got sent to the dean today for wearing this top. My study tech teacher said that I was “exploiting” myself and that it could be a distraction to the other students. I got up out of my seat and told her that I wasn’t going to listen to her dress codes. In a way, she was being misogynist and slut shaming and I think that’s wrong. I will continue to wear what I want and nobody can tell me not to. The fact that womens bodies are sexualized and objectified so much angers me and that’s the reason why this happened. I’m going to wear what I want, how I want, when I want and that’s it.

I was there, reblog the shit out of this guys

I’m a guy. I can’t wear a shirt like this either, even though I’m not going to be wearing a bra. it’s dress code. It’s not slut shaming. You can’t show your bra like that at most jobs. why should you at school? Yes sexism is wrong and all that, but you can’t get ‘angry at the patriarchy” because you can’t show your undergarments in public. I’m not going to wear jeans with a rip in the side  or the front that show off my flowery boxers, because that’s just not appropriate for school. Have some professionalism. You can wear whatever you like at home or with your friends or whatever, yes, but school prepares you for real life.
 At work you can’t have this attitude of “I wear the fuck ever I want.” and expect to keep your job. School is the same way because it’s trying to teach you that lesson. That’s unrealistic; almost any job you get is going to have someone tell you what to wear or what to do because you work for them and you represent their company. If you don’t look the way they need you to look, that makes them look bad. A tattoo parlor probably isn’t going to hire someone who dresses like a nun and a top company isn’t going to hire someone who comes to work in a tank top that shows off her bra or a guy that shows off his ballsack. 
You can’t blame patriarchy for this, I’m sorry. You can’t blame sexism for this. If I wore booty shorts and you could almost see my balls through my semi transparent flowery goddamn boxers, I would get in the same amount of trouble as you, and it’s within good reason.

OP really was just trying far too hard.
Feel lucky you get to wear your normal clothes instead of a school uniform. 

Schools probably should have uniforms because of things like this, even though I fucking hated mine. If it is true (and it might well be) that the teacher said she was exploiting herself that is bullshit.

bastardlybrendan:

oyrishcreme:

sonicdoctors:

dead-end-generation:

So I got sent to the dean today for wearing this top. My study tech teacher said that I was “exploiting” myself and that it could be a distraction to the other students. I got up out of my seat and told her that I wasn’t going to listen to her dress codes. In a way, she was being misogynist and slut shaming and I think that’s wrong. I will continue to wear what I want and nobody can tell me not to. The fact that womens bodies are sexualized and objectified so much angers me and that’s the reason why this happened. I’m going to wear what I want, how I want, when I want and that’s it.

I was there, reblog the shit out of this guys

I’m a guy. I can’t wear a shirt like this either, even though I’m not going to be wearing a bra. it’s dress code. It’s not slut shaming. You can’t show your bra like that at most jobs. why should you at school? Yes sexism is wrong and all that, but you can’t get ‘angry at the patriarchy” because you can’t show your undergarments in public. I’m not going to wear jeans with a rip in the side  or the front that show off my flowery boxers, because that’s just not appropriate for school. Have some professionalism. You can wear whatever you like at home or with your friends or whatever, yes, but school prepares you for real life.

At work you can’t have this attitude of “I wear the fuck ever I want.” and expect to keep your job. School is the same way because it’s trying to teach you that lesson. That’s unrealistic; almost any job you get is going to have someone tell you what to wear or what to do because you work for them and you represent their company. If you don’t look the way they need you to look, that makes them look bad. A tattoo parlor probably isn’t going to hire someone who dresses like a nun and a top company isn’t going to hire someone who comes to work in a tank top that shows off her bra or a guy that shows off his ballsack. 

You can’t blame patriarchy for this, I’m sorry. You can’t blame sexism for this. If I wore booty shorts and you could almost see my balls through my semi transparent flowery goddamn boxers, I would get in the same amount of trouble as you, and it’s within good reason.

OP really was just trying far too hard.

Feel lucky you get to wear your normal clothes instead of a school uniform. 

Schools probably should have uniforms because of things like this, even though I fucking hated mine. If it is true (and it might well be) that the teacher said she was exploiting herself that is bullshit.

queerqueerspawn:

jasontoddsrevenge:

What she said was “I swear those motherfuckers don’t have the ability to empathise” in reference to “white people” not “the white people who visit her blog” just “white people”. That doesn’t make her a “reverse racist” at all, just a plain old racist.

There is no ‘reason’ for hating white people. Racism is an unreasonable, illogical emotional response, often, to some sort of perceived trauma. Whether or not the trauma is real, extrapolating it to the race (or sexuality) of the person who inflicted it is wholly irrational and does not qualify as a ‘reason’ for anything. If someone I loved was murdered by a person of another race, would it be reasonable for me to hate that race? No, it would not, because the race has nothing to do with the murder.

theuppitynegras’s racism might be understandable given that she herself is likely discriminated against for her race, mostly, probably by white people but it is not reasoned or logical and should not be met with tolerance. Same with your claimed hatred of straight people.

Okay, I know Jocelyn doesn’t need me (or anyone else) to come in and fight her battles, so I’m just going to phrase this in terms of heterosexism.

Your whole etiology of bigotry (which you’re passing off as oppression) presumes victimhood. How did my family or any family like mine attack (I’m not even reaching to the point of your comparison, murder) anyone straight. When did *any* queer person, organization, group, or whatever stimulate the systematic pathologization, trivialization, demonization, and in some contexts even eradication of the lot of us? When it comes to actually examining bigotry, this idea of “people being mean” being the backbone of oppression falls apart.

Even if we somehow decide that way back in the eons some queer person was a complete dick and we’re all just suffering in the wake of that, you have to admit that there’s nothing analogous to that that’s being or ever been done to straight people for being straight people.

So, until anything like that is even remotely true, I think you’re going to have to admit that me saying straight people are usually awful would be something entirely different than if I or you or anyone else on tumblr had said oh well queer people are awful. There’s a social context to those statements that you’re not just ignoring but are outright misrepresenting.

And about that larger world we live in, isn’t it ~*logical*~ of me to be weary and wary of straight people after a straight judge attempted to dismantle my family and successfully bankrupted us, after straight people (and gay men concerned about ~heterophobia~ and ~men’s rights~) created a social climate in which my family was isolated and terrified and vulnerable, after a procession of straight mediators came into my and my parents’ lives and told us we needed to accept the sperm donor into our lives, after some more distant members of my family have continued to discuss my parents who have been in a serious relationship for nearly thirty years as if they’re just dating, after coalitions of straight people fought tooth and nail against the employment and housing protections that my family has depended on, after straight majorities in my state (who congratulate themselves for being open minded) voted to refuse my parents certain benefits twice, after the congregation (who also applaud themselves for being so very tolerant) that my parents and several other queer people had attended for years refused to even consider declaring themselves “welcoming” to queer and genderqueer people, after one straight woman there declared to one of my moms that she was raising me to be a “defective” person without a father, after a couple of straight people murdered a gay man a few miles from my house, and after a group of straight people held protests in the state capital calling for me and my parents to be deported.

I mean… shit, I’m not supposed to be able to absorb the pattern here?

OK, I initially thought you didn’t even read my post but I now realise I  phrased it poorly. When I said that racism was ‘often’ a reaction to a perceived trauma, I was not referring to modern institutional or colonial-era racism or, indeed, heterosexism in its institutional and historical forms. In hindsight, the word ‘often’ should probably have been ‘sometimes’ and I ought to have clarified that I meant personal racism (as expressed by theuppitynegress) and personal heterophobia (as expressed by yourself). It was not my intention to equate bigotry with oppression, although I can see how it came across like that.

So, until anything like that is even remotely true, I think you’re going to have to admit that me saying straight people are usually awful would be something entirely different than if I or you or anyone else on tumblr had said oh well queer people are awful. There’s a social context to those statements that you’re not just ignoring but are outright misrepresenting.

I agree that it would be different, yes and even that it would be worse, but I do not agree that your form of bigotry is somehow excusable, even if it comes from oppression. Saying that white people are incapable of empathy is racism. It is not oppressive and probably no one is going to die because of it, but it is hateful and bigoted and the willingness to tolerate it is frankly alarming. You, a white person, spent a post defending the idea that white people are incapable of empathy (you even twisted theuppitynegras’ words so that you wouldn’t have to admit they were talking about you as a white person). Do you really not see anything wrong with this?

A ‘wariness’ of heterosexual people might be logical, in a fairly basic sense, but hatred is not and hatred is what we were talking about. All those awful things that have happened to you and other gay people were inflicted by people who, as far as you know, were straight. Was it the fact that they were straight that made them do these things, or was it the fact that they were uneducated (either generally or on the nature of homosexuality) or religious or bitter or insecure in their own sexuality or for some other reason just unpleasant people? I can fairly confidently say, knowing a few straight people myself, that it is not heterosexuality which makes people wrong you and other gay people but some other factor. I hope to every god that you know at least one straight person who has not wronged you and whom you do not hate, if so, surely you can see that your hatred of straight people is illogical and morally wrong?

I am sorry to have to say this kind of thing, really, because from your post I can see why you feel the way you do and I suspect I would probably feel the same but I think it’s important that if something is objectively wrong then it should not be acceptable, no matter who says it.